The Justice Department wants unredacted voter files from every state that keeps registration records, including names, birth dates, driver's license numbers and partial Social Security numbers, for roughly 160 million registered voters. It sued 31 jurisdictions that refused. Courts have dismissed 27 of those suits, Oklahoma settled, and three remain pending.
U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan vacated the department's voter-list policy nationwide on October 9. She refused to pause that ruling on November 2, and DOJ asked the D.C. Circuit to stay it on November 4. The Supreme Court declined to intervene in California's ballot fight the same day, and DOJ moved on November 6 to drop its suit over about 20,000 California ballots because the state had already mixed them with lawful ones.
Why it matters
The fight decides whether the federal government can see the personal data of 160 million voters and pressure states over election results.
Questions about this story
Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.
No questions yet — be the first to ask.
Key Indicators
31
Jurisdictions Sued
States plus D.C. facing DOJ lawsuits for refusing to turn over voter files
18
States Sharing Data
States that provided unredacted voter data to DOJ before the policy was vacated
27
Cases Dismissed
Lawsuits dismissed (plus 1 settled, 3 pending)
160M+
Voters Affected
Approximate number of registered voters whose data is being sought
Images from Openverse under Creative Commons licenses.
Videos from YouTube.
Voices
Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.
Benjamin Franklin
(1706-1790) ·Enlightenment · wit
Fictional AI pastiche — not real quote.
"A government that demands the private particulars of every citizen in the name of protecting elections reminds me of the man who burns down his house to roast a pig. One wonders whether the fox claiming to guard the henhouse grows more dangerous when he insists all hens be catalogued, numbered, and centrally registered for their own safety."
100% found this insightful
Ayn Rand
(1905-1982) ·Cold War · philosophy
Fictional AI pastiche — not real quote.
"The spectacle of federal bureaucrats demanding a national registry of citizens while states invoke their sovereignty is less a constitutional crisis than a turf war between rival gangs of power-lusters—each claiming to protect your rights while scrambling to catalog you like inventory in a warehouse. The only principle at stake is which level of government gets to treat free individuals as livestock to be counted, tracked, and managed."
100% found this insightful
Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.
47 events
Latest: 5 days ago
Showing 8 of 47
JK to step
Tap a bar to jump to that date
Jump to
November 2026
Federal Prosecutor Who Led Election Probe Resigns
LatestInvestigation
Jason Reding Quinones, the federal prosecutor who led a Trump-backed election probe, left the Justice Department. Al Jazeera reported the resignation as the administration prepared for Democrat-led investigations.
DOJ Moves to Drop California Ballot Segregation Suit
Legal
The Justice Department moved to dismiss its suit seeking to set aside about 20,000 California ballots until immigration statuses could be checked. It said the state had already mixed the challenged ballots with lawful ones. DOJ still pursues a separate suit over California's voter-roll maintenance.
DOJ Asks D.C. Circuit to Stay Voter Policy Vacatur
Legal
DOJ asked the D.C. Circuit to pause the October 9 ruling while its appeal proceeds. It argued the district court treated scattered records requests and enforcement actions as a single agency policy.
Ninth Circuit Clears Way for Federal Election Monitors in California
Legal
A series of Ninth Circuit rulings allowed the Trump administration to send election monitors and observers to California. The court also lifted a block on DOJ action over its voter list; the temporary restraining order had been set to expire November 13.
Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in California Ballot Fight
Legal
The Supreme Court denied DOJ's emergency request to force California to set aside about 20,000 mail ballots while their eligibility was checked. The denial let the state keep counting.
Judge Denies DOJ Request to Pause Voter Policy Ruling
Legal
U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan refused to stay her October 9 order vacating DOJ's voter-list policy. She wrote that a stay applicant cannot show irreparable harm from an inability to engage in unlawful activity.
October 2026
UCLA Analysis Finds 42% of California Flagged Names Not on Voter File
Legal
A filing by two UCLA Voting Rights Project analysts, submitted with the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), found 8,880 of 20,930 flagged names are not in California's current voter file. It also found at least 22 flagged people are U.S. citizens. The U.S. Attorney's office in Los Angeles called the report "bogus."
Judge Blocks DOJ Threats Against Election Workers
Legal
Judge Trina Thompson issued a temporary restraining order. It bars demands that states remove voters or withhold ballots based solely on DOJ's ineligibility claims, and it bars prosecution threats against workers who refuse. She also ordered prosecutors to disclose pending warrant applications and subpoenas.
DOJ Opens California Criminal Probe, Subpoenas Local Officials
Investigation
DOJ issued federal grand jury subpoenas to local election officials in California. The week before, it sent letters to 57 of 58 counties, and it asked Washington state to review 400 alleged noncitizen registrants.
Judge Refuses to Segregate 20,000 California Mail Ballots
Legal
A federal judge denied DOJ's request to set aside 20,000 mail ballots it says came from noncitizens. The ruling questioned the accuracy of DOJ's identification process.
Appeals Court Declines to Block California Mail Ballot Count
Legal
A federal appeals court denied DOJ's request to block California from counting mail ballots cast by alleged noncitizens.
Administration Sues to Block Possible Democratic Win in Alaska
Legal
Al Jazeera reported the Trump administration filed suit to block a possible Democratic win in Alaska. The report does not tie the suit to voter-roll data.
Lawsuit Challenges DHS Voter Data Collection
Legal
New lawsuit alleges the administration obtained voter files from at least 47 states and handled them in violation of federal law.
Judge Vacates DOJ Voter Data Policy Nationwide
Legal
In a suit brought by Common Cause, a federal judge held the policy exceeds DOJ's authority and violates the Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act. The ruling also covers states that had already complied.
DOJ Asks to Pause Voter Policy Ruling, Then Appeals
Legal
DOJ asked the court to pause the October 9 vacatur while it prepares an appeal. It has since appealed to the D.C. Circuit.
Utah Suit Dismissed, 27th Straight DOJ Loss
Legal
Judge David Barlow dismissed the suit against Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson with prejudice. He denied DOJ's request for the state's full voter database.
August 2026
DOJ Loses 21st Straight Court Battle
Legal
Reuters reports the administration had lost 21 consecutive court cases over state voter rolls, with no wins in the campaign.
Sixth Circuit Denies Rehearing
Legal
Court declined to rehear the Michigan case en banc, with dissents.
June 2026
Public Interest Legal Foundation Sues Over Oklahoma Data Law
Legal
The foundation challenged Oklahoma's SB 1086, which limits full voter-list access to state residents and partisan groups. It argues the law conflicts with the National Voter Registration Act.
Sixth Circuit Upholds Michigan Dismissal
Legal
Appeals court affirmed dismissal of DOJ's suit against Michigan, the first appellate ruling in the campaign.
March 2026
Oklahoma Settles, Hands Over Voter Data
Legal
Attorney General Gentner Drummond settled DOJ's lawsuit and provided Oklahoma's data to DOJ. The settlement is the only one in the campaign.
February 2026
Georgia Senate Votes to Pressure Raffensperger
Political
Republican-controlled Georgia Senate passes resolution 31-22 along party lines urging Secretary of State Raffensperger to turn over unredacted voter list containing 8 million voters' personal information to DOJ. Nonbinding resolution opposed by Raffensperger and Democrats. Raffensperger says office will not violate state law protecting voters' SSNs, driver's license numbers, and birth dates.
Fulton County Announces Lawsuit Over FBI Raid
Legal
Fulton County Commissioner Marvin Arrington Jr. announces county will file legal challenge to January 28 FBI warrant that seized 700 boxes of 2020 ballots and voter rolls. County seeks to challenge warrant scope, keep records in Georgia under seal, obtain forensic accounting of seized materials, and protect sensitive voter information.
Senators Padilla and Durbin lead 28 Senate Democrats in sending letter to Attorney General Bondi demanding DOJ stop its "unlawful pressure campaign" to obtain voter data and raise alarm about Minnesota coercion attempt. Letter seeks written responses by February 12 and briefing by February 26.
ACLU Connecticut Intervenes in Lawsuit
Legal
ACLU of Connecticut files motion to intervene in United States v. Thomas on behalf of Connecticut voter, arguing DOJ request threatens voter privacy and enables disenfranchisement.
FBI Raids Fulton County Election Office
Investigation
FBI executes search warrant at Fulton County, Georgia election hub, seizing all 2020 physical ballots, tabulator tapes, and voter rolls. About 25 FBI personnel involved. Director of National Intelligence spotted in FBI evidence truck during operation. Fulton officials not notified beforehand.
Oregon Case Formally Dismissed
Legal
U.S. District Judge Mustafa Kasubhai issues final dismissal of DOJ lawsuit against Oregon, ruling the DOJ's request letter did not satisfy legal requirements and the Civil Rights Act of 1960 was meant for discrimination investigations, not mass data collection.
Bondi Conditions ICE Withdrawal on Minnesota Data
Political
Attorney General Bondi sends letter to Minnesota Governor Walz hours after ICE fatally shot Alex Pretti, demanding voter rolls and welfare data as condition for removing ICE/CBP from Minneapolis. Minnesota Secretary of State Simon rejects demand as "outrageous attempt to coerce" state, calling it violation of state and federal law.
Georgia Lawsuit Dismissed on Venue
Legal
Senior U.S. District Judge C. Ashley Royal dismisses DOJ lawsuit against Georgia, ruling it was filed in Macon instead of Atlanta. DOJ can refile.
Georgia Senate Targets Raffensperger
Political
Georgia Senate Ethics Committee passes resolution demanding Secretary of State Raffensperger turn over unredacted voter data to DOJ.
Wisconsin Seeks Dismissal
Legal
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul files motion to dismiss DOJ lawsuit, arguing the motion is procedurally improper and state law prohibits releasing sensitive voter data.
Virginia Becomes 25th Jurisdiction Sued
Legal
DOJ sues Virginia for refusing to provide voter registration data. Harmeet Dhillon announces 'Virginia becomes the next state sued for ignoring federal law!'
California and Oregon Cases Dismissed
Legal
Federal judges in California and Oregon dismiss DOJ lawsuits. Judge Carter calls the effort a 'fishing expedition' that would chill voter registration.
Voting Rights Groups Intervene in Illinois
Legal
Labor and voting rights groups, including Common Cause Illinois, file motion to intervene in DOJ lawsuit to protect voter privacy.
Wisconsin Voters Seek Intervention
Legal
ACLU files motion on behalf of Common Cause and three Wisconsin voters to intervene in DOJ lawsuit against Wisconsin Elections Commission.
Connecticut and Arizona Sued
Legal
DOJ adds Connecticut and Arizona to ongoing litigation. A Trump-appointed judge in Connecticut orders the state to show cause.
December 2025
DOJ Offers States Settlement Deal
Legal
DOJ proposes memorandums of understanding allowing states to confidentially share data and remove voters flagged by federal databases.
Lawsuit Count Reaches 18 States
Legal
DOJ adds Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, and Nevada to the litigation.
December Lawsuit Wave Begins
Legal
DOJ sues Delaware, Maryland, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington state.
September 2025
Six More States Sued
Legal
DOJ expands litigation to California, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania.
First States Sued: Maine and Oregon
Legal
DOJ files first lawsuits against states refusing to provide voter data, targeting Maine and Oregon.
August 2025
DOJ Invokes Civil Rights Act of 1960
Legal
After states resist citing NVRA and HAVA limitations, DOJ begins citing the Civil Rights Act of 1960's records inspection provision.
July 2025
First Formal Demand Letters Sent
Investigation
DOJ sends sweeping formal requests to states for statewide voter registration lists and names of election officials.
May 2025
DOJ Begins Demanding Voter Data
Investigation
Justice Department sends first letters to states demanding unredacted voter registration files, including driver's license and Social Security numbers.
January 2018
First Commission Disbanded
Background
Trump disbands the commission without it ever receiving state voter data or issuing findings. No evidence of widespread fraud was found.
June 2017
First Commission Requests Voter Data
Background
Kobach asks every state for voter information including Social Security numbers. 44 states and D.C. refuse some or all data.
May 2017
Trump Creates First Voter Fraud Commission
Background
President Trump signs executive order creating the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, chaired by Vice President Pence with Kris Kobach as vice chair.
Scenarios
1
Supreme Court Sides with DOJ, States Must Comply
Possible
Discussed by: Legal analysts at SCOTUSblog and election law scholars anticipating appeals from California and Oregon rulings
If the Supreme Court accepts appeals and rules that the Civil Rights Act of 1960's records inspection provision applies to state voter files, all 50 states would be required to provide unredacted voter rolls to federal authorities. DOJ would gain access to sensitive data for approximately 160 million registered voters, which it plans to cross-reference with DHS databases to identify alleged non-citizens.
2
Courts Block Campaign, States Retain Control
Possible
Discussed by: The Brennan Center for Justice, ACLU, and voting rights advocates who cite the California and Oregon dismissals as indicators
Federal appeals courts uphold the California and Oregon dismissals, finding the Civil Rights Act of 1960 was never intended to authorize mass collection of voter data. Other district courts follow the precedent. DOJ's litigation campaign stalls without Supreme Court intervention. States that refused to comply maintain control of their voter files, and the effort mirrors the fate of the 2017 commission.
3
Mixed Rulings Create Patchwork Compliance
Likely
Discussed by: Election administration experts tracking divergent rulings from Trump and Obama-appointed judges
Federal judges split along ideological lines. Trump-appointed judges in some districts, like Connecticut, order states to comply. Clinton and Obama appointees dismiss cases. The result is a patchwork where some states provide data and others don't, creating an incomplete federal database and prolonged circuit-level litigation before potential Supreme Court review.
4
States Preemptively Change Laws to Block Data Sharing
Possible
Discussed by: State legislators and secretaries of state in Democratic-led states considering statutory changes
States pass or strengthen laws explicitly prohibiting the release of sensitive voter data to federal authorities without specific statutory authorization. This fortifies state defenses against future demands regardless of court outcomes but sets up a longer-term federalism battle over election administration authority.
Discussed by: Legal analysts tracking the D.C. Circuit appeal
If the D.C. Circuit grants DOJ's request to pause the October 9 vacatur, DOJ could resume demanding voter files and running them against federal databases. States that already complied would face renewed pressure.
Historical Context
3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.
1 of 3
May 2017 - January 2018
Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity (2017-2018)
President Trump created a commission chaired by Vice President Mike Pence and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach to investigate alleged voter fraud. Kobach requested voter data including Social Security numbers from all 50 states. 44 states and D.C. refused some or all information.
Then
Trump disbanded the commission in January 2018 after it received no state voter data, faced multiple lawsuits, and generated bipartisan backlash. Commission member Matthew Dunlap later revealed it found no evidence of widespread fraud.
Now
The commission's failure demonstrated that states—including Republican-led states—would resist federal voter data collection on privacy and federalism grounds. The current DOJ effort uses litigation rather than voluntary requests to overcome that resistance.
Why this matters now
The 2017 commission and the current DOJ campaign seek the same data for similar stated purposes. The key difference: DOJ now uses federal lawsuits citing the Civil Rights Act to compel compliance rather than relying on voluntary cooperation.
2 of 3
1960-1965
Civil Rights Act of 1960 and Voter Records Inspection
Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1960 to expose racist voter registration practices in the Jim Crow South. Title III required election officials to preserve voting records for 22 months and produce them upon written demand by the Attorney General. The provision helped prove that registrars applied different standards to Black and white applicants.
Then
Over 16 months, Attorneys General William Rogers and Robert Kennedy inspected voting records in 26 Southern counties. Records revealed white applicants passed literacy tests that illiterate white citizens didn't take, while Black applicants faced impossible standards.
Now
Evidence gathered under the 1960 Act helped build the case for the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The records inspection provision was designed for targeted investigations of discrimination—not mass collection of voter data nationwide.
Why this matters now
DOJ's current use of this 1960 provision to demand unredacted voter files from all states inverts its original purpose. Judge Carter called this 'using civil rights legislation which was enacted for an entirely different purpose' to centralize voter data.
3 of 3
2012-Present
Judicial Watch NVRA Lawsuits (2010s-Present)
The conservative legal group Judicial Watch has filed numerous lawsuits against states and counties for allegedly failing to remove ineligible voters from rolls under the National Voter Registration Act. Settlements resulted in Los Angeles County agreeing to remove up to 1.6 million inactive registrations and Ohio implementing a challenged cleanup program upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.
Then
States and counties entered consent decrees requiring more aggressive voter roll maintenance. Critics argued the settlements pressured officials into removing eligible voters.
Now
These private lawsuits established legal precedent that NVRA compliance could be enforced through litigation. The DOJ's current campaign represents a federal government version of this approach, but with far broader scope and access demands.
Why this matters now
The DOJ effort escalates the private NVRA enforcement model to federal scale. While Judicial Watch sought to force states to purge voters, DOJ seeks the underlying data to identify purge targets directly.
