Pull to refresh
Logo
Justice Department sues California over alleged noncitizen mail-in ballots

Justice Department sues California over alleged noncitizen mail-in ballots

Rule Changes

The Supreme Court rejected the DOJ's emergency bid on Nov. 2. California voted Nov. 3 with the disputed ballots counted. On Nov. 6 the DOJ moved to dismiss its own lawsuit before a planned special master hearing.

Overview

Updated 2 days ago

The Supreme Court refused on Nov. 2 to make California set aside about 20,000 mail ballots until their citizenship could be checked. California held its midterm election the next day with those ballots in the count.

On Nov. 6, the Justice Department moved to dismiss its own lawsuit, days after Republicans' significant midterm losses and about a week before a hearing where special master Daniel B. Garrie was to test the accuracy of the government's list. Judge David O. Carter appointed Garrie on Oct. 29. Grand jury subpoenas had ordered Los Angeles County election workers to appear on Nov. 4.

Why it matters

California counted the ballots the Justice Department called suspect, and the department has now moved to drop its lawsuit.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

20,000+
Voters flagged as likely noncitizens
The DOJ identified more than 20,000 registered voters in California it says are likely noncitizens. Carter denied the bid to set their ballots aside on Oct. 28, the Ninth Circuit rejected the appeal on Oct. 30, the Supreme Court rejected the emergency bid on Nov. 2, and the DOJ moved to dismiss the case on Nov. 6.
28
Foreign nationals charged
Federal prosecutors charged 28 lawful permanent residents with election crimes on Oct. 19; 11 were arrested.
18+
Counties sent 48-hour demands
At least 18 county registrars received DOJ letters dated Oct. 23 ordering them to segregate ballots until citizenship is confirmed.
Nov. 3
Election Day
The midterm election was held Nov. 3, after the Supreme Court declined to block counting of the disputed ballots.
Rejected
Supreme Court emergency bid
The Supreme Court rejected the DOJ's emergency request to force California to segregate ballots on Nov. 2, in a one-sentence order with no noted dissents.
Nov. 6
DOJ moves to dismiss
The Justice Department asked to dismiss its lawsuit on Nov. 6, days after Republicans' midterm losses and about a week before a special master hearing on its list.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

October 2026 November 2026

23 events Latest: 5 days ago Showing 8 of 23
Tap a bar to jump to that date

Scenarios

1

Court grants injunction, California must set aside ballots

Deadline passed (Nov 3, 2026)

Discussed by: The DOJ is seeking this outcome. The Trump administration has argued in other cases that federal law requires states to remove noncitizens from voter rolls.

The judge grants the DOJ's request for a preliminary injunction, an order that takes effect before trial. California must set aside ballots from the 20,000 voters until their citizenship is verified. Eligible voters who were wrongly flagged could lose their vote.

2

Court denies injunction, California counts ballots

Deadline passed (Nov 3, 2026)

Discussed by: Rick Hasen and other election law experts have expressed skepticism about the DOJ's legal authority. Common Cause says the lawsuit may violate a prior court order.

Judge Carter denied the DOJ's request to set the ballots aside on Oct. 28. The Ninth Circuit refused to overturn that on Oct. 30 and the Supreme Court declined to intervene on Nov. 2, so California counted the ballots in the Nov. 3 election. The case itself has not been dismissed.

3

Case dismissed or becomes moot after election

Possible Resolves by Dec 1, 2026

Discussed by: The Justice Department, which moved to dismiss its own lawsuit on Nov. 6

On Nov. 6, days after the midterm election, the Justice Department moved to dismiss its own lawsuit. Judge Carter has not ruled on the request. If granted, the case ends without a ruling on the ballot claims.

4

Ninth Circuit orders ballots segregated before Election Day

Deadline passed (Nov 3, 2026)

Discussed by: The Justice Department, which asked the appeals court to intervene on Oct. 22

The Ninth Circuit rejected the DOJ's emergency appeal on Oct. 30 and the Supreme Court declined to intervene on Nov. 2, so no appellate order held back the ballots before the election. This outcome did not occur.

5

Grand jury charges a California election official

Uncertain Resolves by Jan 31, 2027

Discussed by: The Justice Department, whose grand jury subpoenas ordered Los Angeles County election workers to appear Nov. 4

The subpoenas sought documents about the federal letters alleging noncitizens on the voter rolls. Workers were ordered to appear Nov. 4. An indictment would test how far federal prosecutors can reach into local election administration.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

December 2000

Bush v. Gore (2000)

The Supreme Court halted a manual recount of Florida ballots, effectively deciding the 2000 presidential election for George W. Bush. The Court ruled 5-4 that the recount violated the Equal Protection Clause.

Then

Bush won Florida's 25 electoral votes and the presidency.

Now

Established that federal courts can intervene in state election administration, though the Court said its decision was limited to the facts of that case.

Why this matters now

Shows the precedent for federal courts intervening in state election processes, though such intervention remains rare and controversial.

2018

Georgia voter roll purges (2018)

Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, running for governor, removed hundreds of thousands of voters from the rolls before the 2018 election. A federal judge later ruled the purge violated federal law.

Then

Kemp won the governorship, but the purge drew national scrutiny.

Now

Highlighted how voter roll maintenance can disenfranchise eligible voters, particularly minorities.

Why this matters now

Shows the stakes of voter roll maintenance and the risk of disenfranchising eligible voters.

November-December 2020

2020 election challenges

Trump and his allies filed dozens of lawsuits challenging election procedures and results in battleground states. Nearly all were dismissed for lack of evidence.

Then

Courts rejected the challenges, and Biden was certified as the winner.

Now

Set a pattern of election litigation that continues to shape election law.

Why this matters now

Shows the pattern of challenging election administration through the courts, though this case is pre-election rather than post-election.

Sources

(55)