Laetrile as a cancer treatment (1970s-1980s)
Laetrile, a compound derived from apricot pits, was widely promoted as an alternative cancer cure throughout the 1970s despite no clinical evidence of effectiveness. Over 20 states legalized its use over the FDA's objections, driven by patient demand and political pressure. The FDA could only issue bulletins warning doctors it was worthless and potentially toxic due to cyanide content.
A clinical trial of 178 cancer patients found no anticancer benefit. The Supreme Court upheld a federal ban on interstate shipment of laetrile in 1980.
The laetrile episode established important precedents about the tension between patient autonomy, political pressure, and evidence-based drug regulation. It demonstrated how desperate patient populations can be mobilized to circumvent regulatory safeguards.
Like laetrile, leucovorin addresses a condition where families feel existing treatments are inadequate. Both cases show how demand from desperate patient populations — amplified by political figures — can outrun the available evidence, creating real consequences in drug supply and treatment decisions.
