Italy votes on constitutional overhaul of its judiciary

Overview

Updated May 30

Italy's postwar constitution placed judges and prosecutors in a single, self-governing body to prevent a repeat of fascist-era political control over the courts. On March 22-23, 2026, voters rejected the Nordio Reform by 53.23% to 46.77%. The reform would have separated judicial and prosecutorial careers, split the governing council, and replaced elections with a lottery.

The defeat is a major political setback for Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's coalition ahead of 2027 elections, despite exit polls showing a narrow 'Yes' lead. High turnout of 55.10% exceeded expectations, handing the opposition a unified victory while preserving the unified magistracy.

Why it matters

This would be the most significant structural change to an EU member state's judiciary since Poland's contested reforms triggered years of legal conflict with Brussels.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

53.23-46.77%

Official Result

No wins referendum (15.08M vs 13.25M votes); 55.10% turnout

55.10%

Turnout

Highest for constitutional referendum in years, exceeding 2022 levels

5th

Constitutional referendum in Italian history

Italy has held only four previous constitutional referendums, in 2001, 2006, 2016, and 2020.

78 years

Age of the unified magistracy

The single-body judicial structure dates to Italy's 1948 constitution, designed to prevent executive control over prosecutors.

Turnout quorum required

Unlike abrogative referendums requiring 50% participation, confirmatory constitutional referendums have no minimum turnout threshold.

117

Constitutional scholars opposing the reform

Including three former presidents of the Constitutional Court who joined the 'No' campaign's scientific committee.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

People Involved

Giorgia Meloni

Prime Minister of Italy, leader of Fratelli d'Italia

Concedes referendum defeat as 'lost opportunity'; plans to continue mandate ahead of 2027 elections

Carlo Nordio

Italian Justice Minister

Reform architect sees namesake proposal rejected by voters

Elly Schlein

Leader of the Democratic Party (Partito Democratico)

Leading 'No' campaign celebrates opposition victory

Giuseppe Conte

Leader of the Five Star Movement (Movimento 5 Stelle)

Opposition aligns in 'No' win over government reform

Luca Palamara

Former judge and president of the National Association of Magistrates

Disgraced; his 2019 scandal is central to the reform's justification

Organizations Involved

Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura (High Council of the Judiciary)

Constitutional Body

Unified structure preserved after 'No' vote rejects split

Italy's self-governing judicial body, responsible for appointments, transfers, promotions, and discipline of all magistrates — the institution at the center of the reform debate.

Associazione Nazionale Magistrati (National Association of Magistrates)

Professional Association

Opposition to reform vindicated by referendum rejection

The professional association representing Italian judges and prosecutors, which organized the 'Right to Say No' referendum committee.

Venice Commission (Council of Europe)

International Advisory Body

Has raised concerns about the lottery selection mechanism

The Council of Europe's advisory body on constitutional matters, whose standards hold that at least half of judicial council members should be judges elected by their peers — a principle the lottery model may violate.

Timeline

January 1948 March 2026

13 events Latest: March 24th, 2026 · 6 months ago Showing 8 of 13

Tap a bar to jump to that date

March 2026
Official results confirm 'No' victory: 53.23% reject Nordio Reform
Latest Referendum

With 55.10% turnout (28.34M votes), voters reject judicial career separation, CSM split, and lottery system. Meloni concedes defeat, calling it a 'lost opportunity to modernize Italy'.
March 24th, 2026
Polls close on second day; exit polls show narrow 'Yes' lead
Referendum

Voting ends at 15:00 CET. ANSA/Ipsos exit polls report 52% Yes vs 48% No margin. Official results expected later evening as ~35-40% turnout projected, below 2022 referendum levels.
March 23rd, 2026 • 15:00 CET
Polls open for two-day constitutional referendum
Referendum

Italian voters begin casting ballots on the Nordio Reform. Polls remain open until 23:00, then reopen March 23 from 07:00-15:00. No turnout quorum applies.
March 22nd, 2026 • 07:00 CET
January 2026
'Civil Society for No' committee inaugurated
Campaign

A broad coalition including 117 constitutional scholars and three former Constitutional Court presidents forms to oppose the referendum.
January 10th, 2026
December 2025
'Lawyers for No' committee launches
Campaign

Attorney Franco Moretti chairs a new legal professionals' committee opposing the reform.
December 10th, 2025
October 2025
Parliament gives final approval; bill falls short of supermajority
Legislative

Both chambers approve the reform but fail to reach the two-thirds supermajority that would have made it law without a referendum, triggering the confirmatory vote process.
October 30th, 2025
July 2025
Senate approves reform bill on first reading
Legislative

The Senate passes the constitutional reform with 106 votes in favor, 61 against, and 11 abstentions.
July 22nd, 2025
October 2022
Meloni government takes office, appoints Nordio
Political

Giorgia Meloni becomes prime minister and names former prosecutor Carlo Nordio as Justice Minister, signaling judicial reform as a priority.
October 22nd, 2022
June 2022
Justice referendums fail on 20% turnout
Referendum

Five abrogative referendums on justice reform fail to reach the required 50% turnout quorum, with only one in five eligible voters participating.
June 12th, 2022
May 2019
Palamara scandal exposes judicial faction deals
Scandal

Wiretaps reveal former magistrates' union president Luca Palamara brokered judicial appointments through backroom deals, devastating public trust in the judiciary's self-governance.
May 1st, 2019
June 2006
Voters reject Berlusconi's constitutional reform
Referendum

Berlusconi's broader constitutional overhaul, including judicial changes, is defeated with 59% voting 'No' at 52% turnout.
June 26th, 2006
February 1992
Mani Pulite investigation begins
Investigation

Milan prosecutors launch anti-corruption probes that destroy Italy's postwar political establishment, creating lasting right-wing resentment toward prosecutorial power.
February 17th, 1992
January 1948
Italy's postwar constitution creates unified magistracy
Constitutional

The Constituent Assembly establishes a single self-governing body for judges and prosecutors, explicitly designed to prevent fascist-era political control over the courts.
January 1st, 1948

#timeline [x-show="expanded"] { display: revert !important; opacity: 1 !important; } #timeline .timeline-toggle-btn { display: none; }

Scenarios

Reform approved: Italy splits its judiciary for the first time since 1948

Likely

Discussed by: Lab21 polling (showing 63% Yes among likely voters), Forza Italia leadership framing it as completing Berlusconi's legacy

If 'Yes' prevails, Italy begins implementing the most significant structural change to its judiciary since the republic's founding. Career separation takes effect, the CSM splits into two bodies, and the lottery mechanism replaces elections for council seats. The ruling coalition claims a mandate heading into the 2027 election cycle. However, implementation could face challenges at the Constitutional Court if specific enabling legislation conflicts with other constitutional principles, and the European Commission may scrutinize the lottery mechanism against Venice Commission standards.

Reform rejected: opposition hands Meloni her first major defeat

Possible

Discussed by: Opposition leaders Schlein and Conte, constitutional scholars aligned with the 'No' campaign, some polling showing late momentum for opponents

A 'No' victory would mark a significant political blow to Meloni's coalition, which invested substantial political capital in the reform. The unified magistracy would be preserved, and the opposition would claim vindication of judicial independence concerns. The result could embolden the judiciary in ongoing disputes with the government over migration policy and could reshape the political landscape ahead of 2027 elections by demonstrating that the center-right coalition's electoral strength does not translate to constitutional change.

Ultra-low turnout leaves victor with a hollow mandate

Possible

Discussed by: Ipsos and SWG pollsters projecting turnout potentially below 30%, analysts noting the 2022 justice referendums drew only 20%

Because confirmatory referendums have no quorum, the reform could pass or fail on a fraction of the electorate. If turnout drops below 30-35%, whichever side wins would face questions about democratic legitimacy. A 'Yes' on thin turnout would give opponents ammunition to challenge the reform's moral authority, while a 'No' on thin turnout would allow the government to dismiss the result as unrepresentative. Either way, the underlying tension between government and judiciary would remain unresolved.

Meloni rebound: Government pivots to non-constitutional judicial fixes

Likely

Discussed by: Meloni statements, coalition allies

Despite referendum loss, Meloni vows to continue mandate and pursue judicial efficiency via ordinary laws addressing backlogs and delays, avoiding constitutional changes.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

February 1992-1994

Italy's Mani Pulite investigation (1992-1994)

Milan prosecutors led by Antonio Di Pietro and Francesco Saverio Borrelli exposed systematic bribery connecting Italy's governing parties to major corporations. The investigation, known as 'Clean Hands,' led to over 1,000 politicians and businessmen being investigated, drove former Prime Minister Bettino Craxi into exile in Tunisia, and effectively destroyed the five parties that had governed Italy since World War II.

Then

Italy's entire postwar party system collapsed. Silvio Berlusconi, a media mogul with no prior political career, filled the vacuum by founding Forza Italia and winning the 1994 election.

Now

Mani Pulite created a permanent fault line in Italian politics between those who view prosecutorial independence as democracy's immune system and those who see it as unchecked power wielded by an unelected political class.

Why this matters now

The Nordio Reform is the latest chapter in a thirty-year argument that began with Mani Pulite. Supporters see career separation as preventing prosecutors from becoming political actors; opponents see it as the political class finally succeeding in defanging the institution that held it accountable.

December 2016

Italy's 2016 constitutional referendum (Renzi Reform)

Prime Minister Matteo Renzi staked his political future on a sweeping constitutional reform to streamline Italy's legislative process, abolish the Senate's equal power, and recentralize authority from regions. Renzi promised to resign if the reform failed. Turnout hit 65.5%, and 59.1% voted 'No.'

Then

Renzi resigned the day after the result. His Democratic Party fractured, and the populist Five Star Movement surged in subsequent elections.

Now

The defeat established a pattern in Italian politics: constitutional referendums become personal tests for the prime minister who champions them, regardless of the reform's technical merits.

Why this matters now

Meloni faces the same dynamic Renzi did — a referendum on institutional change becoming a referendum on the leader. Unlike Renzi, Meloni has not explicitly tied her political fate to the outcome, and her party avoided branding referendum materials. But a 'No' vote would carry the same political signal.

2017-2024

Poland's judicial independence battle with the EU (2017-2024)

Poland's Law and Justice (PiS) party restructured the judiciary by changing the composition of the National Council of the Judiciary, creating a new disciplinary chamber for judges, and lowering the Supreme Court retirement age to force out sitting justices. The European Court of Justice ruled multiple elements violated EU law, and the European Commission withheld billions in pandemic recovery funds as leverage.

Then

Poland's judiciary operated under parallel authority structures for years, with EU-aligned and government-aligned courts issuing contradictory rulings.

Now

PiS lost power in 2023, and the incoming Tusk government began reversing the reforms — but unwinding institutional changes proved far harder than making them.

Why this matters now

Italy's reform echoes key elements of Poland's playbook: restructuring the judicial council, changing how members are selected, and creating new disciplinary bodies. Critics argue the Italian lottery mechanism, while different in form from Poland's parliamentary appointment model, achieves a similar result — breaking the judiciary's control over its own governance.