Pull to refresh
Logo
Michigan approves 4.3% natural gas rate hike for Consumers Energy

Michigan approves 4.3% natural gas rate hike for Consumers Energy

Rule Changes Grand Rapids, MI local

MPSC cuts utility's request by 42% after AG calls company a 'monopoly'

Overview

Updated Oct 18

Michigan regulators approved a 4.3% natural gas rate increase for Consumers Energy customers on October 15. The Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) cut the utility's request by 42%, after Attorney General Dana Nessel had urged a 61% reduction.

The decision raises a typical residential customer's monthly bill by $3.92, less than the $7.21 the utility sought. The commission also disallowed $7.9 million in transmission pipeline work, citing a pattern of over-projecting and under-spending. Nessel, who called Consumers Energy a "monopoly", says the system is "fundamentally broken" after nearly $800 million in rate increases since 2020. The new rates take effect November 1.

Why it matters

The hike raises heating costs for 1.8 million Michigan homes and businesses this winter, and may set a precedent for pending rate cases against other utilities.

Last Monday's email for Grand Rapids, MI

Sent Nov 9. It carried:

Get next Monday's: one short email a week. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

4.3%
Approved rate increase
Typical residential customer's monthly gas bill rise of $3.92, effective November 2026.
42%
Reduction from request
The utility's original request was $240 million; the MPSC granted about $139 million.
$800M
Rate increases since 2020
Attorney General Nessel's cited total of MPSC-approved annual revenue increases for Consumers Energy.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

October 2025 October 2026

7 events Latest: October 16th, 2026 · 4 weeks ago
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Rate hike decision draws public attention

    Latest Public Response

    ClickOnDetroit reports on the approved $139.2 million annual increase, which takes effect November 1 for the utility's 1.8 million natural gas customers.

  2. MPSC approves 4.3% rate hike

    Regulatory Decision

    Commission cuts request by 42%, approving a $139 million increase instead of $240 million.

  3. MPSC lays out gas rate order details

    Regulatory Decision

    The commission disallowed $7.9 million in transmission pipeline integrity work, citing a pattern of over-projecting and under-spending, and cut the Enhanced Infrastructure Replacement Program from $234.2 million sought to $207 million.

  4. MPSC orders review of Consumers billing rules

    Regulatory Action

    The commission directed staff to form a workgroup to revisit Consumers' standards for billing, meter reading, dispute resolution and shutoffs (Case No. U-22237).

  5. Consumers Energy files $240M rate request

    Filing

    Utility asks MPSC for a gas rate increase of about 10% to fund infrastructure upgrades.

  6. MPSC approves 8.1% gas rate hike

    Regulatory Decision

    Michigan regulators allow Consumers Energy to raise gas rates 8.1% from November 2025.

Scenarios

1

AG Nessel appeals rate hike to Michigan Court of Appeals

Possible Resolves by Jan 15, 2027

Discussed by: Michigan Advance, Planet Detroit

Nessel has called the MPSC 'fundamentally broken' and may file an appeal within 60 days of the order. If the court agrees, it could send the case back for recalculation, possibly reducing the increase further.

2

Rate hike stands as AG shifts focus to other cases

Likely Resolves by Jan 15, 2027

Discussed by: WZZM, Planet Detroit

If no appeal materializes, the 4.3% increase takes effect in November 2026. Nessel then turns her attention to pending rate cases from DTE Energy, SEMCO, and Consumers Energy's electric request.

3

MPSC reverses course after rehearing request

Unlikely Resolves by Feb 1, 2027

Discussed by: Consumers Energy (speculation)

Consumer Energy could request a rehearing, arguing the cut is too deep and undermines planned infrastructure investments. The MPSC rarely grants rehearings, but if it does, it might raise the increase.

4

AG shifts fire to DTE and Upper Peninsula power cases

Likely Resolves by Apr 30, 2027

Discussed by: Michigan Department of Attorney General

Nessel's office lists open cases at DTE (Case No. U-22046) and Upper Peninsula Power Company (Case No. U-22032). Her fight over executive incentive pay and unsupported costs, which surfaced in both DTE and Consumers requests, could apply to both utilities.

Historical Context

2 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

1968

Permian Basin Area Rate Cases (1968)

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Federal Power Commission's authority to set area-wide natural gas rates, allowing regulators to base prices on industry-wide cost data rather than each producer's individual costs. This gave regulators broad discretion to balance utility profits against consumer protection.

Then

The decision cemented federal oversight of natural gas prices.

Now

It set a precedent for state and federal regulators to cut rate requests when costs appear inflated.

Why this matters now

Similar to the MPSC's decision to reduce Consumers Energy's request based on aggregate cost and profit analysis rather than accepting the company's figures at face value.

2000-2001

California Electricity Crisis (2000-2001)

After partial deregulation, California experienced rolling blackouts and wholesale electricity prices that spiked to record levels. The state intervened with price caps and renegotiated contracts, while the attorney general investigated market manipulation by energy companies.

Then

The crisis led to price caps, consumer refunds, and regulatory reforms.

Now

It demonstrated how state officials can challenge utility pricing when they suspect manipulation or excessive profits.

Why this matters now

Shows the tensions between utility profit motives and consumer protection, and how attorneys general can become central in rate disputes.

Sources

(8)