Pull to refresh
Logo
House advances contempt charges against Bill and Hillary Clinton

House advances contempt charges against Bill and Hillary Clinton

Rule Changes

First contempt action targeting a former president moves forward with bipartisan support

January 21st, 2026: Committee Votes to Hold Clintons in Contempt

Overview

Updated May 22

No former president has ever been held in criminal contempt of Congress. On January 21, 2026, the House Oversight Committee voted 34-8 to advance a contempt resolution against Bill Clinton, with nine Democrats crossing party lines to support it. A companion resolution targeting Hillary Clinton passed 28-15, with three Democratic votes.

The Clintons refused to appear for depositions related to the committee's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, despite bipartisan subpoenas issued five months earlier. The contempt resolutions now advance to the full House for a vote, scheduled in two weeks. If approved, the matter would be referred to the Department of Justice for potential prosecution—the same DOJ that Democrats accuse of stonewalling Congress on Epstein files.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

34-8
Committee vote on Bill Clinton contempt
Nine Democrats joined all Republicans to advance the resolution
9
Democrats voting for Bill Clinton contempt
Including Reps. Frost, Krishnamoorthi, Lee, Lynch, Pressley, Randall, Simon, Stansbury, and Tlaib
5 months
Time since subpoenas issued
Bipartisan subpoenas approved July 23, 2025; Clintons never appeared
<1%
DOJ Epstein files released
Despite legal deadline of December 19, 2025, DOJ has released 12,285 of 2+ million documents

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

2006 January 2026

18 events Latest: January 21st, 2026 · 8 months ago Showing 8 of 18
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Democrats Release Epstein Photos

    Document Release

    Oversight Committee Democrats release photos from Epstein estate showing Trump, Clinton, Bannon, Gates, Branson and others with Epstein.

  2. Committee Releases 33,000 Pages of DOJ Records

    Document Release

    Oversight Committee publishes first major tranche of Epstein-related documents obtained from Department of Justice.

Scenarios

1

House Passes Contempt, DOJ Declines Prosecution

Likely

Discussed by: Legal analysts at CNN, Washington Post; based on precedent from Holder (2012), Barr/Ross (2019), Garland (2024) cases

The full House votes to hold both Clintons in contempt, likely along party lines with some Democratic crossover. DOJ, under Attorney General Bondi, declines to prosecute—consistent with longstanding DOJ policy of not prosecuting contempt citations when executive branch interests are implicated or when prosecution is politically fraught. The Clintons face no criminal consequences. This is the most common outcome for high-profile contempt referrals.

2

House Passes Contempt, DOJ Pursues Prosecution

Possible

Discussed by: Yahoo News, CBS News; based on Bannon/Navarro prosecutions under Biden DOJ

DOJ breaks from its recent pattern of declining politically sensitive contempt prosecutions and seeks indictments against the Clintons. This would require the Trump-appointed DOJ to prosecute a Trump adversary—removing any appearance of political motivation. If convicted, contempt of Congress carries up to one year imprisonment and fines. The Bannon case took three years from contempt vote to prison; Clintons would face similar timeline.

3

Clintons Negotiate Testimony to Avoid Prosecution

Possible

Discussed by: The Hill, ABC News; based on typical subpoena standoff resolutions

Facing the prospect of a full House vote and potential prosecution, the Clintons agree to modified testimony terms—possibly written answers under oath or a limited deposition with counsel present. Chairman Comer has rejected informal arrangements but might accept formal testimony that satisfies the committee's stated investigative needs. This would defuse the contempt charges while giving the committee usable information.

4

Investigation Shifts Focus to DOJ Noncompliance

Uncertain

Discussed by: Rep. Robert Garcia, Rep. Ro Khanna, Rep. Thomas Massie; bipartisan frustration with Bondi

Bipartisan frustration over DOJ's failure to release Epstein files overtakes the Clinton contempt proceedings. With Reps. Khanna (D) and Massie (R) pursuing inherent contempt charges against AG Bondi, the investigation's center of gravity shifts from the Clintons to the executive branch's stonewalling. Maxwell's February 9 testimony—even if she invokes the Fifth—may reveal whether DOJ is withholding material that implicates current officials.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

1994 - 2000

Whitewater Investigation (1994-2000)

Republican-led congressional committees and Special Counsel Kenneth Starr investigated the Clintons' Whitewater real estate investments. The investigation expanded to cover multiple controversies, ultimately leading to Bill Clinton's impeachment over the Lewinsky matter. Congress issued dozens of subpoenas to Clinton officials; some were contested.

Then

29 Clinton administration officials testified before Congress in 1994; all were acquitted of wrongdoing. The Senate Whitewater Committee found document production delays but no illegalities.

Now

Special Counsel Robert Ray concluded in 2000 that evidence was 'insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that either President or Mrs. Clinton knowingly participated in any criminal conduct.' The investigation established precedent for extensive congressional investigation of sitting presidents.

Why this matters now

The Whitewater investigation showed the Clintons can sustain years of congressional scrutiny without criminal charges. However, the current investigation concerns their connection to a convicted sex trafficker rather than financial dealings—a different category of public interest.

June 2012

Eric Holder Contempt Citation (2012)

The House voted 255-67 to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in criminal contempt for refusing to turn over documents related to Operation Fast and Furious, a failed gun-tracking program linked to the death of Border Patrol agent Brian Terry. Holder was the first sitting Cabinet member held in contempt of Congress.

Then

DOJ declined to prosecute, citing President Obama's assertion of executive privilege. The House filed a civil lawsuit seeking document production.

Now

The civil case dragged on for years. A DOJ Inspector General report later found Holder had no prior knowledge of the operation. The case established the modern template: contempt votes generate headlines but rarely produce prosecutions when politically sensitive.

Why this matters now

The Holder case demonstrates that DOJ routinely declines to prosecute contempt citations against high-profile political figures, particularly when executive privilege is claimed. The Clintons are not executive branch officials, but the same political calculus applies.

October 2021 - July 2024

Steve Bannon Contempt Conviction (2022)

The House voted 229-202 to hold former Trump adviser Steve Bannon in contempt for refusing to comply with January 6 Committee subpoenas. DOJ prosecuted. A jury convicted Bannon in July 2022; he was sentenced to four months in prison.

Then

Bannon remained free during appeal. His conviction was upheld in May 2024; he reported to prison July 1, 2024.

Now

Bannon and Peter Navarro became the first former White House officials imprisoned for contempt of Congress. The prosecutions showed DOJ would act when witnesses defied congressional subpoenas outright rather than negotiating.

Why this matters now

The Bannon prosecution shows contempt charges can result in prison time when DOJ chooses to act. Unlike Bannon, who was a private citizen at the time of subpoena, the Clintons are also private citizens—removing any executive privilege defense. But the Clintons argue they've cooperated through written declarations, a distinction from Bannon's complete refusal.

Sources

(18)