Pull to refresh
Logo
What Changed
Following Why Sign Up
Alexandria zoning board postpones 9 Potomac Court deck variance again

Alexandria zoning board postpones 9 Potomac Court deck variance again

Rule Changes Alexandria, VA local

Board granted a second deferral on October 19, and the final November 9 docket still omits the case

November 2nd, 2026: Final November 9 docket omits 9 Potomac Court case

Overview

Updated Nov 3

Alexandria's Board of Zoning Appeals postponed the 9 Potomac Court deck case again on October 19, 2026. Ronnie Vassalo Jr. and Mary Savino asked for the delay so a full board could hear it; four members attended.

The final November 9 docket, published November 2, still does not list the case. It has a garage variance at 208 Virginia Avenue and a fence variance at 3337 King Street, so the deck request has no hearing date.

Why it matters

The deck stays unbuilt until a full board votes, and that vote has now slipped twice.

Last Monday's email for Alexandria, VA

Sent Nov 9. It carried:

Get next Monday's: one short email a week. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

3-2
November 2025 denial vote
The BZA rejected the original 9 Potomac Court deck variance request by a single vote.
343
Days from denial to the October hearing
From the November 10, 2025 denial to the October 19, 2026 hearing, where the board deferred the case again.
2
Variances sought
A rear-yard setback variance and a reduction in required open space.
2
Deferrals of the case
The board re-listed the case on September 14, 2026, then granted the applicants' request for another deferral on October 19.
4-0
October 19 deferral vote
Secretary Eveland moved to grant the deferral, Ms. Bashir seconded, and the four members present voted yes.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Log in Sign Up

People Involved

RJ
Ronnie Vassalo Jr.
Co-applicant and co-owner of 9 Potomac Court
Case deferred a second time on October 19, 2026; not listed on the November 9 docket, so no new hearing date is set
MS
Mary Savino
Co-applicant and co-owner of 9 Potomac Court
Case deferred a second time on October 19, 2026; not listed on the November 9 docket, so no new hearing date is set

Organizations Involved

City of Alexandria Board of Zoning Appeals
City of Alexandria Board of Zoning Appeals
Appointed city board
Granted a second deferral of BZA2026-00010 on October 19, 2026; the case is not on the November 9, 2026 docket

Appointed by the city council, this board hears variance, special exception, and appeal cases.
Alexandria Department of Planning and Zoning
Alexandria Department of Planning and Zoning
City department
Provides staff support to the BZA

City staff that manage zoning applications, prepare staff reports, and support the Board of Zoning Appeals docket.

Timeline

November 2025 November 2026

7 events Latest: November 2nd, 2026 · 1 week ago
Tap a bar to jump to that date

  1. Final November 9 docket omits 9 Potomac Court case

    Latest Filing

    The city published the final docket for the November 9 BZA hearing. It lists a garage variance at 208 Virginia Avenue and a fence variance at 3337 King Street, with no entry for BZA2026-00010.

  2. BZA defers 9 Potomac Court case a second time

    Hearing

    The applicants asked for a deferral so the case would be heard by a full board. With four members present, the board granted it 4-0 and adjourned at 7:17 p.m.

  3. BZA defers 9 Potomac Court deck variance to October 19

    Hearing

    The board heard the resubmitted request for rear-yard and open-space variances and deferred a decision. The case is re-listed for a public hearing on October 19, 2026.

  4. BZA denies 2500 Dewitt Avenue variance 3-2

    Decision

    The board rejected another residential variance request by a narrow margin while approving a special exception at 414 Duke Street 5-0.

  5. BZA denies 1030 Cross Drive variance 5-2

    Decision

    A month after the deferral, the board denied the Cross Drive variance on a 5-2 vote, showing its strictness on the merits.

  6. BZA defers 1030 Cross Drive variance

    Decision

    The board postponed a variance request for 1030 Cross Drive at the applicant's request, leaving the case open.

  7. BZA denies original 9 Potomac Court deck variance

    Decision

    The board rejected the first variance request for a deck at 9 Potomac Court by a 3-2 vote. It approved an ADU variance at 2500 Dewitt Avenue the same night, 6-0.

Scenarios

1

BZA approves 9 Potomac Court deck variance

Deadline passed (Sep 14, 2026)

Discussed by: No public predictions; the outcome turns on the board's "unnecessary hardship" analysis.

The applicants, possibly after tweaking the deck design during the hearing, convince the board that the townhouse's lot shape makes strict compliance impractical. The board votes to grant the rear-yard and open-space variances, clearing the way for construction. This would break the board's recent pattern of denying several variance requests.

2

BZA denies the variance a second time

Deadline passed (Sep 14, 2026)

Discussed by: The board's strict 2026 voting record, including the May 1030 Cross Drive denial and the July 2500 Dewitt denial.

The board finds no "unnecessary hardship" — the lot is not uniquely constrained, or the owners created the problem. It rejects the application by a vote similar to the November 3-2 outcome. This would match the board's 2026 pattern of denying most variance requests it hears on the merits.

3

BZA defers the item to a later hearing

Deadline passed (Sep 14, 2026)

Discussed by: The board's April 2026 decision to defer 1030 Cross Drive at the applicant's request.

The board postpones the decision, either at the applicants' request to revise the plan or on its own motion. A deferral keeps the case alive without deciding the merits, pushing the next hearing to a later month. The 1030 Cross Drive case shows the board does occasionally defer, though it later denied that case.

4

BZA votes on 9 Potomac Court deck variance on October 19

Deadline passed (Oct 19, 2026)

Discussed by: The board's 2025-2026 record: it rejects most variances on the merits but grants relief when the hardship is tied to the property's physical constraints.

The board hears BZA2026-00010 again on October 19 and either grants the rear-yard and open-space variances or denies them. Approval clears the way to build the deck. A second denial would send the owners back to the drawing board or into court.

5

BZA approves the 9 Potomac Court deck variance

Possible Resolves by Q1 2027

Discussed by: The board's record of granting relief when the hardship is tied to the property's physical constraints.

At a hearing with more members present, the applicants convince the board that the townhouse lot makes strict compliance impractical. The board grants the rear-yard and open-space variances, clearing the way to build the deck.

6

BZA denies the 9 Potomac Court deck variance a second time

Possible Resolves by Q1 2027

Discussed by: The board's 2026 pattern, including the May 1030 Cross Drive denial and the July 2500 Dewitt denial.

The board finds no unnecessary hardship, concluding the lot is not uniquely constrained or that the owners created the problem. A second denial would send the couple back to redesign the deck or to court.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

April-May 2026

1030 Cross Drive variance denial (2026)

The BZA deferred a variance request at 1030 Cross Drive at the applicant's request in April 2026, then denied it 5-2 a month later. The applicant sought relief tied to the property's conditions but failed to clear the board's hardship bar.

Then

The variance was denied, and the property owner had to rework the plan or pursue other options.

Now

Reinforced the board's strict interpretation of Virginia's variance standard.

Why this matters now

A deferral — one possible outcome of the September 14 hearing — often leads to a denial, not an approval, when the case returns.

November 2025

Same-night contrast: 2500 Dewitt Avenue ADU variance (November 2025)

On the same night the BZA denied the original 9 Potomac Court deck variance 3-2, it approved an accessory dwelling unit variance at 2500 Dewitt Avenue by a 6-0 vote.

Then

The ADU variance was granted, allowing the property owner to proceed with construction.

Now

Illustrates the board's case-by-case approach: clear constraints earn relief, less clear ones don't.

Why this matters now

The September hearing tests whether the 9 Potomac Court applicants can make a hardship case as strong as the ADU one.

Long-standing

Virginia's unnecessary hardship doctrine (established by state law)

Virginia law requires variance applicants to show that the property's peculiar conditions create a hardship that is not self-created, and that the relief won't harm the neighborhood. Courts apply this test strictly across the state.

Then

Boards across Virginia deny variances when the hardship stems from the owner's own choices.

Now

Kept the variance a narrow safety valve rather than a broad exception to zoning.

Why this matters now

This is the exact standard the Alexandria BZA applies to the 9 Potomac Court request.

Sources

(13)
+7
City of Alexandria Legistar City of Alexandria The Common News Open Publica DocketCity City of Alexandria Legistar City of Alexandria MyTown Alexandria roundup Alexandria Land-Use Hearings City of Alexandria City of Alexandria Legistar City of Alexandria City of Alexandria