1
Putin-Xi summit produces concrete Power of Siberia 2 movement
Possible
Resolves by May 21, 2026
Discussed by: Bloomberg, South China Morning Post, Moscow Times
Putin's preview of 'a serious and very substantial step' on oil and gas points to long-stalled pipeline progress. Beijing has resisted Moscow's preferred terms on volumes and price for years. A signed intergovernmental agreement or named contractor would mark the first hard movement on Power of Siberia 2 since talks began in 2014.
2
Joint declaration is ceremonial, no major new agreements
Likely
Resolves by May 21, 2026
Discussed by: Foreign Affairs, MERICS analysts, Council on Foreign Relations
Beijing has just locked in a fragile US trade truce. Xi has reason to keep the Putin meeting symbolic and tied to the treaty anniversary, avoiding moves that could give Washington a pretext to reopen tariffs. Analysts at MERICS and elsewhere have noted China's pattern of front-loading rhetoric and slow-walking deliverables in the Russia relationship.
3
Russia-China announce new dollar-alternative payments mechanism
Possible
Resolves by End of 2026
Discussed by: Reuters, Eastern Herald, Russian Foreign Ministry briefings
Bilateral trade already runs 95% in rubles and yuan, but a formal joint mechanism for clearing, banking, or BRICS-aligned settlement remains a stated goal. New US secondary sanctions on Russian oil buyers in late 2025 sharpened the incentive. A formal announcement would expand the workaround framework other sanctioned states could plug into.
4
US-China trade truce holds through end of 2026
Likely
Resolves by End of 2026
Discussed by: CSIS, CNBC, CBC
Trump and Xi agreed to a 'constructive, strategic and stable' framework on May 14. The Putin visit will test whether Beijing's Russia ties trigger a Washington response. If the rare-earths rollback and tariff suspensions remain in place through year-end, the framework is real. If either side reimposes restrictions, it was rhetoric.
5
Power of Siberia 2 framework signed before end of 2026
Possible
Resolves by End of 2026
Discussed by: Washington Post, CNBC, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov
The Kremlin claims 'an understanding on main parameters' after Beijing, but the pricing gap is wide. Beijing wants gas near Russia's domestic rate; Moscow wants roughly double. Iran-war energy disruptions have added urgency on China's side. A final intergovernmental framework by year-end is plausible but depends on Beijing deciding it needs the supply more than it needs the price concession.