U.S. v. Lovett (1946)
Congress passed a rider to an appropriations bill barring payment of three named federal employees alleged to be subversive. The Supreme Court struck it down as an unconstitutional bill of attainder.
The three employees received their back pay.
Established that Congress cannot use the appropriations power to punish specific individuals or impose conditions beyond its constitutional authority.
The core legal question in Fresno's case is similar: can the executive branch impose conditions on funding that go beyond what Congress authorized? The precedent establishes limits on how funding can be conditioned.
