Pull to refresh
Logo
Argentine judge drops $LIBRA fraud case against Milei

Argentine judge drops $LIBRA fraud case against Milei

Rule Changes

A federal court found no crime in the president's promotion of a crashed crypto token. A substitute judge has now asked the prosecutor to weigh in on reopening the case, and Cassation will review whether investors can rejoin as plaintiffs.

Overview

Updated 5 days ago

On October 23, Federal Judge Marcelo Martinez de Giorgi cleared President Javier Milei, his sister Karina and nine others of fraud over the $LIBRA token. He ruled that promoting it was not a crime. About 40,000 buyers lost money after the token, launched at roughly a cent, spiked near $5 and collapsed within hours.

The case is not closed. The Anticorruption Prosecutor's office has asked to reopen it, and on November 5 substitute judge Daniel Rafecas asked prosecutor Eduardo Taiano for his view; titular judge Martinez de Giorgi is expected to decide next week. Separately, the Federal Chamber of Cassation agreed on November 4 to review whether two investors can rejoin as plaintiffs.

Why it matters

A head of state was cleared of fraud over a crypto token he promoted, leaving tens of thousands of investors without a criminal route to recover their losses.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

$251M
Estimated investor losses
TokenPost estimated total losses at about $251 million across roughly 114,000 wallets, with about 86% of traders losing money.
40,000+
Buyers who held $LIBRA
The federal resolution refers to more than forty thousand people who had bought the token before it crashed.
11
People cleared by dismissal
Judge Martinez de Giorgi cleared Milei, his sister Karina, and nine other defendants.
$100M
Pulled by creator-linked wallets
Around $100 million withdrawn by a few wallet addresses, per the court resolution; BBC reported about $90 million, more than 80% of circulating funds.
$4.6B
Peak market capitalization
Market cap briefly reached about $4.6 billion after Milei's post, then fell more than 90%, according to TokenPost.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

February 2025 November 2026

14 events Latest: 6 days ago Showing 8 of 14
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Milei nominates Rafecas to appeals court

    Political

    The same day Rafecas handled the reopening request, President Milei sent the Senate his nomination for Rafecas to sit on the Federal Chamber of Cassation.

  2. Milei says he may sue La Nación over $LIBRA coverage

    Reaction

    After his dismissal, Milei attacked the newspaper and journalist Hugo Alconada Mon over their reporting and said he was weighing legal action with his lawyers.

  3. Milei promotes $LIBRA on X

    Event

    Milei posts about the $LIBRA token on X; priced at about $0.01 at launch, it climbed to near $5, then crashed as creator-linked wallets sold.

Scenarios

1

Appeals court overturns dismissal, investigation resumes

Possible Resolves by End of 2027

Discussed by: Perfil noted the ruling can be appealed; investors were excluded as parties in the original case

The dismissal is not final. Affected investors or other parties could appeal to Argentina's Federal Chamber of Cassation, arguing that the judge applied the fraud statute too narrowly. If the chamber reinstates the investigation, the case would resume where it left off.

2

Dismissal stands; $LIBRA criminal case legally closed

Likely Resolves by End of 2027

Discussed by: The prosecutor himself recommended dismissal, and the judge agreed

With the prosecution recommending dismissal and the judge finding no criminal offense, an appeal is unlikely to succeed. The case ends, and the 40,000-plus affected investors have no criminal channel for restitution. Political scrutiny of the episode may continue outside the courts.

3

US authorities pursue separate action against Hayden Davis

Possible Resolves by End of 2027

Discussed by: Reuters and blockchain researchers highlighted the $99 million in wallet withdrawals linked to the token's creator

The Argentine dismissal does not bind US prosecutors. If the US Department of Justice or Securities and Exchange Commission determines that Davis's role in the token's launch and sell-off violated US law, he could face separate proceedings. No US action has been announced.

4

Dismissal becomes final with no appeal

Likely Resolves by Nov 30, 2026

Discussed by: Perfil, citing the prosecutor's decision not to appeal and the exclusion of investor plaintiffs

Prosecutor Eduardo Taiano asked for the case to be closed and will not appeal, and the lawyers for affected buyers were removed as plaintiffs in September 2026. Once the short appeal window lapses, the criminal case ends and the roughly 40,000 buyers have no criminal route to compensation.

5

Cassation reinstates the excluded buyers, keeping an appeal alive

Possible Resolves by Q1 2027

Discussed by: La Nación, citing the Cassation panel of Alejandro Slokar, Guillermo Yacobucci and Ángela Ledesma

The buyers' lawyers were removed as plaintiffs in July 2026, and the Federal Chamber upheld that in September. They have asked the Federal Chamber of Cassation to put them back in the case. If it does, they could appeal the dismissal itself, and the same panel already holds a separate appeal from Belarusian buyers who say they lost about $4 million.

6

Judge reopens $LIBRA case at PIA's request

Possible Resolves by Nov 30, 2026

Discussed by: The Anticorruption Prosecutor's office (PIA), which filed the reopening request

Substitute judge Daniel Rafecas has asked prosecutor Eduardo Taiano for his view, and titular judge Marcelo Martinez de Giorgi is expected to decide next week. If he grants the request, investigators would resume tracing funds and examining communications. If he refuses, the PIA's subsidiary appeal sends the question to the Federal Chamber.

Historical Context

2 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

November 2021

Squid Game token rug pull (2021)

The developers of a Squid Game-themed token (SQUID) disappeared with roughly $3.38 million after the token's price spiked and then crashed about 99.99% in minutes. The token had no official connection to the Netflix series.

Then

Exchanges delisted the token, and affected investors had little recourse.

Now

It became the textbook example of a "rug pull," the mechanism alleged in the $LIBRA case, in which token creators pump value and then dump their holdings.

Why this matters now

In the $LIBRA case, blockchain researchers linked eight digital wallets to the token's creator that withdrew around $99 million before the crash, a similar dump pattern.

October 2022

Kim Kardashian SEC settlement (2022)

The Securities and Exchange Commission fined Kim Kardashian $1.26 million for promoting EthereumMax on Instagram without disclosing she was paid $250,000 for the post.

Then

She paid the fine and agreed not to promote crypto securities for three years.

Now

The case set a US precedent that public figures must disclose payment for crypto promotions.

Why this matters now

It contrasts with the Argentine ruling, where a public figure's undisclosed promotion of a crashed token was found not to be a criminal offense.

Sources

(23)